Immigration

Energy to Action: "Vota Por Tu Futuro" to Register Young Latinos

When hundreds of thousands of young latinos marched in the streets to protest HR4437, which would have established a border fence and instituted a variety of anti-migrant measures, their chant was "Today we march, tomorrow we vote."

In some respects this turned out to be true. The Hispanic vote swung dramatically towards the Democrats. Yet in others, it was less so. New voter registrations failed to materialize after the rallies.

A lack of political experience helps explain why the flow of new registrations has been halting. Some activists acknowledge that their groups have yet to master the nuances of voter registration drives -- a typically face-to-face task more complex than mobilizing a march. Others complain that political parties with the most to gain haven't financed registration efforts.

"Until the money is spent, 'Today We March, Tomorrow We Vote' will always just be a slogan," said Nativo Lopez, president of the California-based Mexican-American Political Association. "A million new registrations would cost about $10 million. Is anybody willing to pay that? I haven't seen it."

A new effort by Voto Por Tu Futuro (Vote 4 UR Future) seeks to change that. The effort is a partnership between Telemundo, mun2 - a youth focused channel - as well as political organizations like Rock the Vote, the US Hispanic Leadership Institute,and Democracia USA. Vote 4 UR Future appears to be primarily a media campaign, with PSAs and in-show advertisements directing young latinos to register to vote. In this, it would seem to most resemble MTV's Choose or Lose, a media blitz which funneled hundreds of thousands of young Americans to Rock the Vote's online voter registration tool in 2004.

In and of itself, this is a great first step. As NDN has noted, Hispanics are an important, growing portion of the electorate, and since the immigration debate they are voting Democratic by margins of 3-1. By 2050, they will be 1/4 of all voters, and they are already 18% of all Millennials. NDN also identifies young latinos, who are more acclimatized than their parents, as the political influencers in their households. Campaigns that reach out to and politicize these young voters make inroads to the larger Hispanic community.

Of course, this is only the first step. Registration is important, but it is all for naught if turnout doesn't increase as well. There is no indication as of yet as to what the campaigns GOTV strategy will be, though its partnership with Rock the Vote might give some indication. Research by Young Voter Strategies (now the research arm of Rock the Vote) show peer to peer outreach to be the most effective form of voter mobilization. We might see neighborhood canvasses in high-concentration hispanic neighborhoods led by one of the campaign's partner organizations.

Canvassing, however, is incredibly expensive. Especially for nonprofits with small budgets. The most likely form of GOTV we'll see is text message reminders in the weeks leading up to the election. When young 1st and 2nd generation americans rallied against punitive immigration legislation in 2006, those rallies were organized primarily by text message and social networking. According to a report by the New Politics Institute, Hispanic youth are twice as likely as whites to have a cell phone as their primary means of communication. Text Message GOTV seems a tactic ideally suited to turning out this community, and it is proven to be an effective GOTV tool. A recent study by Working Assets, Princeton, and the University of Michigan revealed that text message reminders are effective at bumping turnout by up to 5%, at the incredibly low cost of $1.56 per voter (compared to $30 for door to door canvasses). That's not a bad return on investment for cash-strapped non profits serving the Hispanic community.

For Democrats, this long overdue focus on Hispanics could potentially mean large gains in the South West, particularly in the swing state of New Mexico, where Hispanics already comprise over 30% of the electorate. How successful this campaign will be is an open question, nevertheless, this is an important development, and something to follow in the coming months.

MTV Keeps Innovating - New Social Network and Immigration Forum

It's an MTV-packed day. I just got two items in my inbox alerting me to some more political innovation from MTV.

The first comes from Josh Levy of Tech President, who alerted me to the fact that later today MTV is set to launch Think MTV, a social networking site focused on activism and politics that will incorporate some video features similar to YouTube.

Levy notes that this may be a sign of MTV's desperation to compete against companies like FaceBook, MySpace and YouTube who are invading their market share and have probably long since eclipsed the network at the cutting edge of youth culture. I see Levy's point, and I've long been skeptical of attempts by companies and organizations to set up their own social networks, yet the Think MTV site looks pretty slick, and with their 50-state Vlogger strategy, MTV certainly will have a lot of interesting content to populate the video feeds. Right now Think MTV is only open to 14 year olds through "recent college grads" and non profits with verifiable EIN numbers. I've applied for PR "invite" to the site and will write a thorough review if I get access.

The second item to hit my inbox in the last couple hours is a press release for a forum on Immigration at Cal State University in Los Angeles. The event will be held on September 29th and will be immediately followed by the premier of True Life: I Live on the Border, a documentary about three young people on different sides of the issue.

I found MTVs contributions in 2004 to be somewhat lackluster, but they are really taking the lead this cycle in developing compelling media strategies to engage young people in both the election and more esoteric public policy discussions. I think maybe an in-depth, birdseye view of their activities is in order, as well as some digging into how this radical change in their election programming came about.

And the Racism Keeps on Coming . . .

Earlier this week I posted about a new Democracy Corps report showing that the Republican brand had crashed among Millennials. Well the conservatives are starting to respond, and the racism is flying like mad:

Read the report in full, however, and you come across an interesting nugget on page 6: White young people continue to favor Republicans by a thin but real margin of 2 points. The Democrats owe their advantage among youth to a huge lead among young African-Americans (78 points) - and a very large lead (43 points) among Hispanics.

In the past, Republicans could win elections despite their unpopularity among ethnic minorities. But with the huge surge of immigration since 1980 - and especially since 2000 - the voting map of the United States has been redrawn in ways inherently deeply unfavorable to the GOP. If Republicans face an inhospitable future after 2008, we will hear much of the dreadful legacy of George W. Bush on social issues, the war, the environment, etc. But Greenberg's own work makes clear that these issues matter relatively little.

(Only 28% of young voters would respond positively to an anti-religious-right message, for example: see page 11.)

No, the legacy that will damage his party is the legacy of immigration non-enforcement. This has imported a large new community of people who are both economically struggling (and thus open to Democratic arguments) but who lack deep attachment to the American nation (and who are thus immune to the most potent of Republican appeals). It is these voters who will sway elections in future. And thanks to this president's immigration policies, there are going to be a lot more of them than there might otherwise have been.

Awesome idea. Kick those anti-American wetbacks (read: naturalized citizens and first generation Americans who vote Democratic) out so the white man can rule supreme one more.

Great strategy. Let me know if that pans out for ya.

Update: Rick Perlstein tears Frum apart on similar grounds.

Favorite Networks, Talib Kweli, and A Final Word on College Activism

A couple quick hits today:

  • A new survey by eMarketer looks at social network popularity (on behalf of advertisers) and finds that FaceBook is by far the most popular social networking tool among both men and women 17-26 years of age. Apparently its still not where the high school kids hang out.
facebookstatsmale facebookstatsfemale

(click to enlarge)

  • Campus Progress has an interview with hip hop artist Talib Kweli about the relationship between art and activism, and a whole bunch of other interesting if slightly off-topic stuff.
  • Finally, Ben Adler weighs in on the NYU Immigration stunt, making a similar point to those made by me and Sam G-F of the Nation about the need for a more aggressive College Democrat program.

Sorry for the light content. More this weekend.

Footage from the Field

Sam Graham-Felsen, who covers the youth movement beat for The Nation, was on the ground at yesterday's NYU protest. Watch his video report or read his thoughts on the day - which echo my own - here on The Nation's blog.

Campus Tactics

UPDATE - I’m collecting stories from College Democrats for anecdotes to include in my book and to inform my views about the organization, which I did not participate in while I was an undergrad (lo those many years ago). I’m collecting those responses over at Daily Kos, or feel free to email me directly with your personal experiences with the college dems. I want to know:

  • Why you did (or did not) participate in the college democrats,
  • Whether or not they were effective in your area (be specific), and
  • Finally I want to know how you think College Democrats could be improved as an organization.

==================

So I feel somewhat obligated to talk about this since its actually getting national media attention (courtesy of Drudge).

As per usual, College Republicans, this time at NYU, have come up with a controversial activity to bump up their visibility and promote one of their issues. Outrage du jour is an illegal immigrant hunt on campus. Kinda reminiscent of Monty Python’s Olympic Hide and Seek final, but a little racist and xenophobic.

NYU Progressives are responding by organizing a counter protest via FaceBook.

I don’t want to beat an old horse here - I’ve criticized college dems a lot - so let me just pose some questions (and I’m genuinely looking for answers). In particular I would love to hear from you if you are a college democrat reading this site:

  1. Is this a lose-lose situation for the college dems? Won’t anything we do just give the College Republicans more press and increase the effectiveness of their action?
  2. Is that a good enough reason to NOT protest?
  3. Why do we always seem to be playing defense? How come the only time I hear about College Democrats is when they are responding to College Republicans? Why don’t I ever hear about Republican responses to College Dem operations?
  4. It’s interesting that the College Dems organized via FaceBook, but not the College Republicans. Maybe it really is true that left-leaning folks use social networking more (or more effectively for political ends). Agree or disagree?

Immigration

Body: 

This article is incomplete. If you know of any easily accessible, comprehensive resources on this topic, or if you feel qualified to write a brief article, please sign in and edit this wiki entry.

Policy Primer

Talking Points

Fact Sheets

Think Tanks

Issue Organizations

Immigration

Body: 

Policy Primer

Talking Points

Fact Sheets

Think Tanks

Issue Organizations

Syndicate content