Facebook

With the new information out about Facebook allowing data and access to it's users for advertisers and the new and improved privacy settings, the recent Pew Survey about youth attitudes toward privacy couldn't be more timely.

"Some 71 percent of social networking users aged 18 to 29 have changed the privacy settings on their profile to limit what they share with others online"

This compares to just 55 percent of users who are 50 to 64. I'm sure there's a crack I could make here about it being because they just haven't signed on in six months...

Further

"44 percent of young adult Web users limit the amount of personal info available about themselves online."

I frequently hear reporters talk about the accessibility of information on individuals who are members of the Millennial Generation. Whether naughty photos on facebook or drunken tweets, the talking point has been that young people are free and open to exposure. I think these numbers show that while young people are open to accessibility to some extent, they have a larger amount of control over the information that they are giving than perhaps previously assumed.

After all - one doesn't have to fill out the entire facebook profile page, right?

"Contrary to the popular perception that younger users embrace a laissez-faire attitude about their online reputations, young adults are often more vigilant than older adults when it comes to managing their online identities," Madden wrote in her May 26 report."

I had a conversation with a guy at an event last week who wondered what election cycle we'd start to see photos from facebook and twitter from their college days or high school being used against them as they're running for office. More specifically when we would begin to see photos surface or "controversial" tweets that suddenly became part of the standard for opposition research and used in campaign commercials.

I think we've started seeing some of that with campaigns that try to go after staffers of candidates. We've see Obama staffer photos from facebook and incoming White House staffers back in 2008 were asked to provide their facebook links and answer questions about any embarrassing emails they might have sent.

I think this is probably up to begin in the next 5-10 years but it might be 15 before we see it at the Presidential level. But my spin to the guy I was talking to was that our generation is accustom to the concept of accessibility to information about ourselves and the increased lack of privacy. As the Greatest Generation and Baby Boomers begin to die off and Millennials take the lead in the electorate, I predict we'll see a rejection of this kind of information to be a valid form of attack against a candidate.

With such a huge majority of young people on social networking sites there is surly a deeper level of understanding and solidarity with tagged photos and profanity in tweets among Millennials. I can't imagine that in the Millennial Congress politicians will be able to get very far using this for attacks. There will probably be a period of transition where shocking things will surface and older generations will naturally be aghast and horrified - but realistically they weren't voting for a progressive candidate anyway.

What is interesting is the level of privacy control that youth seem to have over their own data. Meaning - as long as they are the ones posting the embarrassing photo it's fine, but Facebook better not allow advertisers to find my demographic info for the purposes of market research and targeting. For that - 71% alter their settings on the site. As long as there is a possibility of control, users all seem to be cool on the facebook front.

With these new settings and concerns I found this fancy Top 10 Privacy Settings Every Facebook User Should Know guide. I will make a plea, however, please, don't think your facebook and twitter pages disqualify you for seeking higher office. We need more young candidates, not less.

Yesterday students from across the state of New Jersey walked out of their classes and descended upon Newark to protest Republican Gov. Chris Christie's education budget cuts.

The walkout and protest grew organically from the online efforts of Michelle Ryan Lauto, a Pace University freshman who attended high school in New Jersey, who used Facebook to propose the action. Students then used these same online tools to organize their own individual schools and collaborate on strategy:

They also used Facebook to trade advice on contacting newspapers and television stations to publicize their rallies, while Lauto logged on to urge students to keep their protests peaceful.

(...)

In Newark, students also turned to Twitter and text messaging to coordinate a walkout of thousands of students at schools across the state’s largest city.

The incredible organizing effort impressed some school board members:

Newly minted school board member Shavar Jeffries was on hand to support the students' protest.

"I'm very proud of our kids for protesting in a peaceful, disciplined way," he said adding that while the students were enthusiastic they maintained order. "They're organized, they're disciplined, they're beautiful."

(...)

School board member Nakia White also expressed her admiration.

"I think the social activism among our youth is incredible," White said. "They're absolutely defying the myth of apathy and not caring, and they're standing up for what they believe in. They believe in education."

Throughout the country Millennials have been self-organizing using online and mobile tools, from the student protests in California, the immigration protests in Arizona, and yesterday in New Jersey. As Republican policies hit young Americans harder the efforts will only increase. This level of engagement is a positive sign for the Democratic Party, both because of the energy and organizing as well as the further inclination toward the Democrats in reaction to these Republican policies. Young voter enthusiasm may not be the problem for Democrats that some say it is.

The Republic National Committee has added a new tool to its arsenal in the high-stakes battle for the lifetime allegiance of Millennial voters. FarmVille, a popular Facebook application game with over 80 million monthly users, allows players to "grow delicious fruits and vegetables and raise adorable animals on your very own farm!"

The RNC is hoping to capitalize on the "neighbors" component of the game. Neighbors, who are friends and contacts who connect with each other through the game, allow players to level up faster and accumulate more plants, animals, and decorations for their farm. The idea is to turn their FarmVille neighbors into fans of the RNC Facebook page as a foot-in-the-door to more meaningful outreach and participation.

The official RNC Farmville account will be managed by staffers within the organization's new media department. A video explaining the new program has been posted to YouTube.

Come on Democrats, you let the RNC beat you to FarmVille. You have to at least try for Mafia Wars.

Earlier today President Obama answered questions submitted through CitizenTube via the White House Live Facebook application.

I had hoped to have the video from the question and answer session to embed here, and have been waiting for it since CitizenTube hours ago claimed that it would be available shortly, but unfortunately it is not yet posted. (I'll add it once it is, whenever that may be).

I was pleased for the most part with the question selection, which included questions about Sudan (an area many Millennials are interested in), net neutrality, college affordability, and one from the Energy Action Coalition about clean energy and the environment.

As for the execution of the session, the video quality was a little choppy and would occasionally stop, requiring a refresh, but the chat/status posting discussion was a nice touch.

On the whole I think the session was a great move and fits in with my belief in taking your message to the places where people live and hang out (even virtually), and Facebook is certainly one of those places.

What are your thoughts about the President's Q&A over Facebook? What would you like to see next time?

Imagine a situation out of "To Catch a Predator," but instead of trying to bust people soliciting underage sex they bust college students for underage drinking.

That's exactly what the police department in La Crosse, Wisconsin is doing.

The La Crosse police department set up a fake Facebook account for an attractive female student and began sending friend requests to University of Wisconsin students who were under 21. If a student accepted the friend request, the police would scour through that person's photos looking for evidence of them consuming alcohol. The police then contact the student, and since at that age the authority of a police officer seems unquestionable, many respond:

Mr. Luebker faced similar questioning, and both said they now regretted even responding to the officer's request to meet. Both had friends who were also drinking in Facebook pictures, but who didn't talk to the officer and were never ticketed.

When Mr. Luebker and two of his friends were contacted, they said, they were worried what would happen if they didn't talk to the officer. "We were scared, like, Oh crap," he said. "I wish I would have said, No, it's a stupid idea. That's what you've been taught, since ever. Do what the authority tells you to do."

I think that our generation is about to face a privacy clash.

For many, a Facebook profile is their own personal space where they hang out with friends. Sneaking around someone's profile is like sneaking around their room. Those that started using Facebook early on knew that everyone on the site had a college email address, leading to an habitual false sense of security . Since then Facebook's popularity has exploded and has opened up to everyone, but old habits die hard.

It can take a long time to use all of the new privacy settings and organize people into lists of who can see what, and many people have never even attempted to configure them, but now may be a good time to take a crack at it.

Police officers, debt collectors, college administrators, potential employers, and others are now using Facebook to track you down or find dirt on you. We need to be more careful, so I leave you with a couple of things to remember:

• Don't blanket-accept friend requests - You may have your privacy settings set so that only friends can view your profile, but that isn't stopping people from sneaking in. Make sure you have an idea about who a person is that is requesting you. The most common espionage account is for an attractive young woman. At a minimum create a list with full limited profile and stick these people in it if for some reason you feel compelled to accept them.
• Don't post things you don't want people to see - Regardless of how strong your privacy settings are, once something is on the internet, it's pretty much there forever. I also suggest being very selective in who can see pictures tagged of you.

Personally I think that what the police is doing in La Crosse is ridiculous and a waste of resources, but it's going to keep happening and in more places.

What are your thoughts on these Facebook sting operations and/or Facebook privacy?

The Pew Internet and American Life Project finds that while an older audience is moving to Facebook, Twitter is becoming younger.

Martha Irvine, an AP youth beat writer, wrote a story on this development a couple days ago, finding that while a significant number of youth are moving to Twitter, many of them are doing so grudgingly believing that Twitter updates contain too much minutiae for their tastes.

"Quite frankly, I don't need to hear if someone stepped in dog poo on the way to class or how annoyed they are that they lost their favorite pen," says Carolyn Wald, a University of Chicago junior who has not joined Twitter and rarely posts status updates on Facebook because "I don't want to assume that people want to hear those things about me, either."

One explanation for this surge is the increased availability of wireless devices for youth today. The study reports that the more wireless outlets youth have, the more probable it is that they will tweet.

NetCentric Advocacy picks up on something interesting. Mentions of the term "health care" on Facebook are currently at one of the lowest points since the final weeks of the election. In short, there is no campaign for reform happening on one of the biggest social networks in the country. The following chart shows the number of mentions of the phrase "health care" on Facebook wall posts over the last 12 months:

Facebook Lexicon, which produced the graphs, doesn't show the exact number of mentions. Rather, this is just a relative comparison of the popularity of the term over time. Still, the number of mentions is significantly smaller than during the election, particularly during the peak in November of 2008.

So what's going on here? Why does it seem like there is no activity on this topic online? Is this a failure of measurement? The lexicon results do end around mid-July, so it is possible that we're just not registering a huge surge in interest happening right now. Or is this a failure of organizing?

• From the White House Blog, Jill Biden extols the virtues of community colleges.
• A new study suggests that Facebook users are getting older.
• Remember the election protection effort Twitter Vote Report? Check out a case study of the project.
• Kal Penn has officially started his White House job.
• ePolitics discusses Iran, Independence Day, and the limits of Online Politics.
• The New York Times covers the latest in summer trends: jobless summers.
• Generation Y reflects on what it means to be American.
• Youth-magnet cities continue to see growth during recession.
• Young Mayors bring fresh perspectives.

Future Majority has a shiny new Facebook page. Become a fan and spread the word.

Bill Maher's recent comment that "Twitter didn't save Iran. Iran saved Twitter" has sparked some debate about the use of social media and its relevance to important issues and events.

Personally, I don't think Maher's comment hits the mark. Twitter wasn't a service that needed saving, nor is it alone responsible for helping promote Iranian protests. It would be more accurate to say that Iran helped the general public realize Twitter's potential, and that Twitter is one component of a new media toolset that is enabling activists in oppressive regimes to communicate where state-run media dominates.

The situation in Iran shows the world that the communications game has changed. It isn't Twitter or Facebook specifically, but the general principle of online and mobile communication.

Mashable created a social media timeline of the Iran Election crisis. It shows how a wide range of online tools have played a role in getting the stories of Iranian protesters to the outside world. These tools range from Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube to Flickr and even Wikipedia.

The essence of the matter is that previously if a country expelled all foreign journalists and had a state-run media, the world would have no way of knowing what was happening within its borders. The emergence of online and mobile technology has turned every person with a camera, cell phone, or computer into an amateur journalist; on location and with unfiltered access journalists have never truly enjoyed.

While it may be a while before these new media tools can change the game everywhere (Africa is still largely left behind, and they could use it the most), the Iran election protests have shown the world what online organizers have known for some time now: social media has fundamentally advanced the way we communicate and coordinate.