A Declaration for Our Generation
After months of information gathering on their website and in the field, and after a conference in which 50 youth leaders worked collaboratively to craft a statement based on their personal experience and the collected data, Mobilize.org has released their first draft of Democracy 2.0: A Declaration of Our Generation. The text, which is not yet available online, is as follows:
Democracy is an unfinished project. It’s time we upgrade.
We, the Millennial Generation, are uniquely positioned to call attention to today’s issues and shape the future based on the great legacy we have inherited. Our founding fathers intended for every generation to build, indeed to innovate, on the American experience. We realize that as young people we are expected to be the leaders of tomorrow, but we understand that as citizens we are called to be the leaders of today.
We are compelled by the critical state of our present democracy to establish a new vision.
In a world often damaged by conflict and intolerance, we must commit to develop common ground through equality and open mindedness.
In a world often damaged by social isolation and materialism, we must commit to community at the family, local, national and global levels.
In a world often damaged by instant gratification, we must commit to creating sustainable solutions.
In a world often damaged by apathy and disillusionment, we must commit to civic participation and inclusion of all voices.
The present state of our democracy impedes opportunity for real change. We must connect the specific issues failing our population with their underlying systemic causes.
Our government seems unable or unwilling to adequately address our broadest problems, including economic inequality, America’s role in the world, and the effect of money on the democratic process. But we must remember, our government is only as effective as the sum of its citizens. Low civic participation means the most disadvantaged people in society are neglected and we overlook many potential solutions to our problems.
Our generation is telling a different story. We are uniquely positioned to foster community engagement through social networks of all kinds. It is our responsibility to use information and technology to upgrade democracy, transform communication and advance political engagement and civic participation.
We are social networkers, we are multi-taskers, we are communicators and we are opinionated. The informality of our generation breaks down traditional barriers and opens doors for inclusiveness and equality. Most importantly, we are leaders in a society that yearns for leadership.
It’s our democracy, it’s time to act.
In my previous coverage of this project, I noted that attempts at creating generational statements of purpose seemed to happen once or twice every decade in politcs, and that Mobilize.org would need to clear a number of hurdles if their project was to be both useful and effective at provoking change in our political system. First, it would need to be inclusive of many different groups - something frequently not the case in the past, since manifestos seem to get written by a small cadre of like-minded individuals working in private.
In response to the first issue, Mobilize.org seems to be on their way to success. The current document was written collaboratively by a diverse group of 50 individuals who, with the help of a discussion moderator and electronic voting tools, synthesized responses of over 1000 individuals to an initial survey posted on the Mobilize.org website. These individuals were a mix of Republicans, Democrats, Independents and Greens, and spanned all race/ethnicities except for Native American.
The resulting document (above), is itself only a draft. Mobilize.org will soon be posting it on their website along with a wiki and inviting anyone to comment and suggest edits. In December, 435 individuals, one from each Congressional District, will convene to further refine the document, which they will then bring back to their districts.
The second obstacle that I identified was was that of utility. Will those 435 organizers use the document and push it out in their districts? And If so, will the document actually increase the effectiveness of youth organizations or bring about a change in the attitudes or understanding of our issues among politicians?
On this account there is still much doubt about the ultimate effect this document and the Democracy 2.0 project will have in changing our politics. The document contains numerous statements of intent and purpose, yet many of these could be twisted towards the purposes of either Democrats or Republicans. Committing to the family at the local state and national level doesn't say how government should proceed on issues like Choice or abstinence only education. Advocating for sustainable solutions could equally mean less-effective mechanisms that "protect" the economy (read fossil fuel companies), just as much as it could mean Apollo-program size investments in a new energy economy.
This is itself, a feature, not a bug, in the eyes of Mobilize.org and the Democracy 2.0 team, who strive to be "all-partisan," yet without more specificity, it's hard to see how the document could be an effective roadmap leading a generation toward a concrete resolution of the problems it identifies. Rather it provides cover for all sides to stake a claim as addressing the concerns of the younger generation without guaranteeing a break in the partisan gridlock we now face.
I continue to find this odd, because we know that young people have ideas about these issues. A declaration that makes no firm commitments cannot be said to represent the voice of a generation that has shown allegience towards certain solutions to our society's problems.
A final thought. The statement encourages its readers to act, yet makes no mention of the fact that young people are acting. The climate change movement has received a huge burst of energy from young people looking to get involved. Voter turnout is rising dramatically, and dozens of new political and civic organizations founded by young people have started in recent years. Generational change has long been afoot, and it seems anachronistic and out of touch for the Declaration of our Generation to be so unaware of the environment in which it exists.
I'm not giving up on this project - far from it. I'll reserve my final judgment until I see the document that comes out of December's Party for the Presidency and those 435 representatives begin to move from documentation to implementation of these ideas.
Breaking News
Think Progress:
Terrorist fist jab: 1, E.D. Hill: 0.In June, Fox News anchor E.D. Hill infamously called a fist pound between Barack and Michelle Obama a “terrorist fist jab.” Hill’s remarks were met with widespread criticism and ...Political Wire:
Senate Race UpdateU.S. Senate races in Georgia, Minnesota and Alaska remain unresolved.In Georgia, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution notes the first day of early voting for the run off between Sen. Saxby Chambliss ...TPM Election Central:
AFL-CIO Ramps Up In Georgia Senate RunoffThe AFL-CIO, which helped prove labor's organizing muscle with its formidable ground game in the battleground states, is now ramping up big time in the high-stakes Georgia runoff, putting in place an ...Political Wire:
Judgement Day for LiebermanSens. Christopher Dodd (D-CT) and Ken Salazar (D-CO) "will offer a compromise plan today to sanction Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (I-CT) for his support of the Republican presidential ticket but allow ...Marc Ambinder:
"If You Leak, You're Gone."Several Obama transition staffers have put a version of that quotation in transition co-chief John Podesta's mouth.Many of the major staff appointments so far - Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff, Greg ...
2008 Youth Vote in Context
The following charts and graphs are meant to contextualize the unique role that young voters played in the 2008 election, and their increasingly important role in a winning electoral coalition:
2008 Youth Electoral Map

2004 Youth Electoral Map

Youth Vote Partisan Advantage: 2000 - 2008

Youth Vote Historical Support: 1976 - 2008

Recent Blog Posts
-
UPDATE: I'm listening to this again, and I'm thinking this might just be a horrible joke on the show gone awry, especially after finding out that very little can be taken seriously on this show in ...by: Craig Berger | 9 comments
-
Marc Ambinder continues his question to educate us about the difference between VANs and VoteBuilders, Catalist and MyBo. Meanwhile, Sarah Lai Stirland at Wired thinks that all these databases pose ...by: Michael Connery | 0 comments
-
The Obama campaign has received a lot of acclaim for its use of technology. Here are some tools you can use to build your presence online. Scribd Scribd is an online document-sharing tool that the ...by: Kevin Bondelli | 0 comments
-
Pew Research has a new report: Young Voters in the 2008 Election. The details of the report read like they were ripped right from the blog posts here at Future Majority - I could get used to that. ...by: Michael Connery | 0 comments
-
Some Sunday reading: The New York Times reports that President Obama may have to give up his blackberry. It certainly is nice to have a technologically-engaged president in the White House who is ...by: Craig Berger | 1 comment
Blogroll
- Ablogistan
- Apophenia
- Bad Subjects
- Burnt Orange Report
- Campus Progress
- Campus Vote
- College Democrats
- Culture Blog
- The Daily Background
- The Daily Taylor
- Ezra Klein
- Everyday Citizen
- For Which It Stands
- Generation Next
- Got Democracy
- It’s Getting Hot in Here
- Kevin Bondelli
- Kid Oakland
- Kossacks Under 35
- Left in the West
- Liberal College Kid
- The Low Post
- Matt Ortega
- Michigan Liberal
- Michigan Youth Political Alliance
- Millennials Changing America
- Open Left
- Penn Progress
- Planting Liberally
- Policy Farm Team
- Political Teen Tidbits
- Prose Before Hos
- Pullman Progressive
- Pushback Network
- The Raw Story
- Rethinking Youth
- Rock the Vote
- Tapped
- Think Youth
- Young Democrats
- Young MO Politico
- Young People For
- Young Philly Politics
- Young-Politics
- YouthinkLeft
- WireTap
- Wonkette
If you have a blog written by or for young progressives, and you would like to be listed, contact Mike.
Young Progressives
- 21st Century Dems
- Black Youth Vote
- The Bus Federation
- Campus Climate Challenge
- Campus Progress
- Campus Wellstone
- Center for Progressive Leadership
- College Democrats
- DNC Youth Council
- DMI Scholars
- Forward Montana
- Future 5000
- Generation Change
- Generational Alliance
- The League
- Kossacks Under 35
- Lose the Label
- Minnesota Youth Caucus
- New Era Colorado
- Oregon Bus Project
- Progressive U
- Roosevelt Institution
- Run For Office
- Students for a New American Politics
- Swing Semester
- USSA
- Washington Bus
- Young Democrats of America
- Young Elected Officials Network
- Young People For
- Young Voter PAC
Cultural Capitalizers
- All Ages Movement Project
- Billionaires for Bush
- Drinking Liberally
- Free Culture
- Head Count
- Hip Hop Summit Action Network
- Ironweed Films
- Justice Through Music
- Laughing Liberally
- Lokahi Outreach
- National Hip Hop Political Convention
- ONE Campaign
- Progressive Book Club
- Rock the Vote
- Screening Liberally
- Vera Project
- Youth Movement Records
























Hrm...
I don't think collaborative statements have much punch unless they're specific, coalition solidarity tied to circumstances and action. The whole process here could be really interesting if they were hashing out some kind of organization or creating an expansive document full of specific examples, but cowdsourcing a manifesto is at best an exercise in organization, especially when it's so vague.
I don't really know what the plan is here, and I like your wait-and-see attitude. I mean, there's nothing wrong with this kind of effort.
What I would really like to see is some kind of meaningful collaboration on a more substantive (and maybe slightly more radical) document of principles, with the invitation for individual contributors to create specific examples or explanations around specific points. For instance:
That one paragraph could (and maybe should) be unpacked into a series of short essays or better yet video explanations. If you want to go post-partisan you could potentially even explain each of those things from the left and the right. That would seem to be a much more useful and vital way to construct a meaningful and powerful document for driving Democracy 2.0, rather than hashing out the verbage with 450 participants.