Have We Finally Turned that Corner?

Ever since 2004, those of us who have been involved in youth outreach have been annoyed, to put it mildly, by the constant parroting of the lie that young people are apathetic, and that they will not vote. No matter how many studies came out, no matter how many experts debunk this myth, and despite the fact that the last two elections showed a pretty significant upswing in young voters, the media seemed determined to parrot talking points that claimed that young people were not worth doing outreach towards, and many campaigns seemed to go right along. Well, it looks like we may finally have turned the corner in regards to this meme, as Time Magazine featured an article last week titled Reaching Out Early for the Youth Vote.

Even in a presidential campaign that has started as early as this one, Heather Smith couldn't have expected she would already be so busy. But "my phone started ringing the day after midterms and it hasn't stopped ringing since," says Smith, 30, the executive director of Young Voter Strategies (YVS). Her non-partisan organization, which she founded after the 2004 election with funding help from Pew and George Washington University, analyzes how to best mobilize young voters. That section of the electorate has traditionally been treated as an afterthought until weeks before the actual voting. But this time around top presidential contenders and political strategists are starting to focus early on the youth vote.
...
Smith's tips could be more important than ever in 2008. After more than a decade of declining or stagnating numbers, turnout among voters under age 30 increased by almost 5 million in 2004 and almost 2 million in 2006. Voting experts say this is because a new generation has come of age — the Millienials — and they are more civically engaged young adults than so-called GenXers were during the 1990s. The Millenial Generation — those born between 1979 and 1994 — is also three times the size of Generation X. They've voted Democratic in the last two elections and according to a New York Times/CBS News/MTV poll released in late June, they plan to again in 2008. That poll found that 54% of voters under age 30 say they intend to vote Democratic. But 40% of young adults ages 18 to 24 describe themselves as Independents, according to an April poll by the Harvard Institute of Politics. Because of that, Smith says Republicans could still win the youth vote in 2008.

Welcome to the real world, Time Magazine! I hope you enjoy your stay!

I guess my only real question at this point is: why haven't our phones been ringing off the hooks?

My only question in regards to the article has to do with this quote:

"Nobody in either party thinks that the youth vote is not worth paying serious attention to and spending money on programs to get them registered and turned out."

Really? I mean, I know that there are a few good progressive groups out there giving pretty heavily to youth outreach programs, but the Democratic Party seems pretty incapable of reaching out to a younger audience. But hell, maybe they've turned that corner too.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

IMHO

I think that the non-profit and organization world is so far ahead of the political world that it isn't even funny. You look at what some of the orgs do with technology and how they were utalizing it early on and how long it took for campaigns to begin utalizing it... it astonishes me. Only after TIME named "YOU" as the person of the year talking about social networking and YouTube et al - only THEN did most of the campaigns go... oh... really?

Call me crazy but I think it has a lot to do with isolationist cultures within the political scene. Average age of people who are taken seriously inside the beltway and those who lead campaigns is not of the "tech generation" and it seems to me that most of those people are resistant to utilizing new technologies unless they are running for office. Few people seem to want to communicate with as many forms of technology as possible unless they're trying to get money or votes - which I think decreases the learning curve or the interest in learning and implementing more.

You don't see a lot of YouTube or MySpace usage by the House and Senate staffers - its mostly from the campaign side and lets face it - no one campaigns unless they have to... Which makes sense - it costs more to campaign than it does to have the tax payers fund your communication to your district or state - but it also costs a lot in the form of longterm savvy. Something I wish we could fix - but chances are slim that it'll actually happen that way...