Millenial Dilemma

Bumped --Mike.

By Matt Sherman

With all the election news about increased turnout from people ages 18-29, television hosts seem giddily intrigued by the political habits of “young people,” as if we were some exotic and alien demographic of the American electorate.

The truth is, we Millenials (is that what they’re calling us?) are Americans like everyone else – just younger. We may not have lived through history, but we know the story. We may not have a family right now, but we will someday.

As citizens, we’ve taken advantage of all the new opportunities afforded us in the 21st century. We’ve graduated from high school and college at higher rates than in recent memory. We’ve contributed to the increased productivity from labor in the last decade. We were the first generation to grow up with computers, and we still give our parents a computer lesson every now and then. In short, we’ve been pretty good citizens.

And yet, we’ve been the hardest hit by the wage stagnation in our economy over the last three decades. After adjusting for inflation, the wage of the typical 18-29 year-old worker was about 10 percent lower in 2007 than it had been in 1979. Despite being more tech-savvy and better educated, we’re getting paid less.

A lot of this is outside of our control, influenced by political decisions in Washington and massive fluctuations in the economy. But there is one surefire way that young people can improve their living standard – unions.

A new report from the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) analyzes data from the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey (CPS) and finds that unionized young workers (age 18-29) earned, on average, 12.4 percent more than their non-union peers. The trend was the same even in the lowest-wage occupations. The average non-union young worker made $8.74 per hour, while the average unionized young worker made $10.62 per hour. Unionized workers were also more likely to have good benefits, like employer-provided health care and pension plans.

You can find the full report here.

Matt Sherman is a 2008 graduate of the University of Virginia and an intern at the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, DC.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Is that what they’re calling us?

"The truth is, we Millenials (is that what they’re calling us?) are Americans like everyone else – just younger."

I think that it's extremely important that we reclaim the term millennials. It's what they're calling us, yes, but its up to us to define what it means. Otherwise, it's reduced to a political and commercial advertising term and we're reduced to consumers and voters.

Terminology

It's worth noting that we actually picked the term ourselves. It comes from the original Strauss and Howe study in which the respondents were given a choice between that, GenY, iGeneration and a whole bunch of others (and I think maybe even a "write in" category, though I'm not 100% on this).

That said, I agree with Alex that it's a term that needs to be owned and defined by us, and I think we're actually well on the way to that. Most marketing/media language I see still clings to the Gen Y label. The term Millennials shows up mostly in relation to politics, where it is really gaining traction as the catch-all term for our generation. I think we're doing a good job so far in defining what that means and how it is different from Boomers or Gen X and previous conceptions of "youth." I think for the most part it has positive connotations closely associated with activism and participation and optimism, rather than consumption and passivity.

Agreed

I use it as much as I can. People don't use it enough.

It's important that we use it because of the fact that it was indeed chosen by us as the term that fits.