Millennials in the Workforce

Via the provocatively-named Die, Boomer, Die, I found an interesting piece from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review about the challenges and opportunities of integrating Millennial-generation employees into workplaces and businesses which were created and dominated by Boomer thinking:

In the workplace, [Millennials] are going to expect responsibility, independence, creativity and respect. They may express a preference for working in teams. Most expect to hold four to six jobs in their lifetime.

They will want a voice in things that affect them, and they may request job sharing and telecommuting opportunities.

And the onus will be on employers to satisfy — or lose — them.

This is interesting, and it reminded me of something I read way back in 2001 in the now-defunct Context magazine, with Royal Dutch Shell Executive turned London Business School Prof. turned Social Philosopher Charles Handy talking about the paradigm of the Elephant and the Flea, about how the most winning players in the economies of tomorrow would leap away from elephantine corporate employers to strike out on their own:

It seems to me that large organizations are increasingly going to be young places. Starting out, people will have apprenticeships in large organizations. After 10 to 20 years, they will either jump or be pushed out of large organizations and live a more independent life.

Five years ago, 66% of corporations in Britain had just one person in them.

This is less common in the U.S. because medical insurance is so expensive. That is a huge drawback that deters people from going out on their own. This is something that must be reformed soon because I believe the future belongs increasingly to the independents.

Being a flea isn’t all bliss. Adapting to life as a flea is dramatic.

You need to belong to something. If other people don’t matter to you, you don’t matter to them. So, you have to build your own community of mattering with friends and colleagues. But, if it becomes too formal, you constrict yourself.

Handy may have mis-calculated with his prediction that younger workers would spend a decade or two toiling as corporate apprentices — in fact, it seems more likely to me that corporations will become increasingly grey places — but his predictions of independence and self-defined communities seem to be bearing out so far.

This is all pretty interesting to me because I’m a business owner and the “old man” of the company at the age of 27. My experience of employment and workplace is a-typical, but it seems clear that things have changed quite a lot over the past twenty years or so. Corporations are no longer objects of trust, and the rise of the Creative Class seems to be a real phenomena. At the same time, the servitude industry (McDonalds, Wal*Mart, the GAP) still dominates many people’s career options.

What are your thoughts about the future of work and employment for our generation? What about unions? Are self-employed and freelance unions the future, or will we see some new form emerge to organize workers around their mutual self interest?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Non Profits

This is really interesting. So I don’t have that traditional a work history either. After short lived forays into grad school and journalism, I entered the nonprofit/political field, which seems like its’ pretty much where I’m going to be for a while now. I guess this is the 10-20 years part of my career.

But in my experience, the older folks in the nonprofit field - at least the ones that I work directly with - are eager to try new things, and my youth and previous experiences - as short lived as they are - are valued things at my office. Maybe its the nature of the industry, but many players - especially late Boomers and the Xers who hold the reins, are very much interested in transitioning away from old models. Granted, it is a slow slog, but I don’t think I’d ever be asked to leave a meeting like Die Boomer Die reported on his blog.

As for unions - to be honest, I don’t have strong opinions here. In some respects, I see their immense value in attaining better pay and benefits for their members, and serving as a political and economic check on runaway corporate interest. On the other, they very much seem like a relic of bygone days. I haven’t paid nearly as much attention to Andy Stern’s work as I should, but I wonder if he really can update the Unions for the 21st Century. And as you’ve said in the past (I think), we really need to decouple health insurance from employment. That in itself would be a huge victory all around, but it also knocks a leg out of the union movement’s platform. But maybe that’s a good thing in that our efforts shouldn’t be to prop up a union movement, but to achieve the tangible ends of that movement.

I find the idea of a strong freelancers incredibly appealing. Esp. as I can fairly easily see myself in a position to use it in the next 10 years.

On a related note, the “Kossacks Under 35” folks over at Daily Kos just did a diary last night about starting your own business.

You Can't Scare Me, I'm Stickin' to the Union!

I think unions are going to (hopefully) evolve with our generation. Maybe it’s because I just watched Reds last night, but it really made me think of how critical communication is to effective organization, and about how the conditions for communication between now and previous periods of union activity are vastly different. It’s the revolutionary in me, I know, but with the internet, the idea of One Big Union really seems to be possible.

It would be One Big Network, really, but I do think it’s going to take something on that scale to effectively resist the organized influence of large corporations, particularly on the frontier of things like the WTO, which has been swept under the rug lately, but is still a faceless, undemocratic, unaccountable international organization who’s authority supercedes that of local democratic authority and often goes directly against the Public good, etc.

In the end, building an organization like that requires a huge amount of trust, and trust requires communication too. Driving down the costs of communication and breaking through institutional/cultural/nationalistic silos is something that the internet is proving to be very effective at. It’s going to be interesting to see how this plays out as the facade of the Global War on Terror as primary national distraction continues to fade, especially if any one of the fragile legs propping up the current economy (mass consumer debt, housing bubble, international currency arbitrage) were to buckle.